Monday, 8 February 2010

Global Warming and Breast Cancer

I've long thought that the breast cancer advocacy was one of the most successful marketing efforts of our time. It's clear that the "global warming" lobby is quite a bit less successful. Why does the one do so well while the other struggles? Here are some thoughts:

1. Breast cancer is well named and easily defined. I bet that the people who popularized "global warming" wish they had that one back. It's better than a lot of alternatives - "catastrophic global climate change" is perhaps more accurate but what a clunker. Two of the big words in the arsenal, "planet" and "environment" have too many sci-fi and hippie connotations to introduce an effective, objective cause. "Climate change" might have been a better option, but it still fails to convey the breadth of the issue - we aren't just talking about the thermostat going up or down a few degrees, we're talking about eradicating the ability of our and many other species to inhabit the planet. Hard to wrap up on a ribbon, eh?

2. You and I, this minute, could do something that would make us feel as though we'd done something measurable to fight breast cancer. Donating some money, encouraging a loved one to get a mammogram, putting a pink ribbon on a car - whatever the actual efficacy of any of these acts, they give us a link to the solution and empower us to be a part of the change. I forgot the stupid reusable bags when I went to the grocery store today, so I'm evil, but even still - the magnitude of the problem and the lack of any feedback loop make it nearly impossible to feel as though you've had any impact.

3. How much did your meaningful contribution cost you? Did it cost your uncle his job at a factory? Did it cost your 401(k) to decline by 30%? Was India or China or any other entity able to benefit from your breast cancer contribution while simultaneously increasing its contribution to the problem? Do you feel like you are trying to empty a lake with a bucket while a bunch of other people are aiming their garden hoses at that lake?

4. How many people do you know who died of global warming last week? Last year? Last ever? Not saying it didn't happen, in fact I believe it did happen to everyone, it's just that we haven't got the evidence to convict.

5. Breast cancer is non-ideological, non-partisan and apolitical. Climate change is, unfortunately, none of the above.

6. Do you think that cancer can be cured, or its effects severely ameliorated? I bet you don't feel the same way about climate change.

I'm able to dismiss the faction that takes a Biblical view that God has promised, after Noah, to never again try to eradicate mankind and uses that as a shield against climate change. Conversely and maybe perversely, I'm able to take it on faith that school kids in New Zealand not being allowed outside during the heart of the day because there's a big old hole in their sunbrella that wasn't there pretty recently is just plain wrong and not a coincidence. I've watched "An Inconvenient Truth" and was moved by it, but all you have to do is look at my PowerAgent files to know how tweaked a perspective the charts and graphs can give you. I'm very sympathetic to there being a problem with how we are treating the planet, but I'm also conservative enough to be a little bit self-conscious about typing a sentence that contains the phrase "how we are treating the planet."

I also think cap and trade, especially when permits are exchanged for anything other than prohibitive compensation, is a sham that will benefit no one but the fine folks at Goldman.

My point here isn't to solve global warming or whatever we're going to call it, no matter my thoughts on whether there's a monster in the closet or not. No, I'm just thinking about some of the ways that those who advocate for the issue can frame the discussion a little more effectively.

And I always get slagged on for being some kind of arch-conservative, but I don't sound like one to me.

6 comments:

mrsmith said...

You are an arch-conservative, it's just that the world (and particularly the Republican party) forgot what it meant to be conservative. FYI, it doesn't mean letting businesses do whatever it takes to raise their stock prices, social, environmental, and moral consequences be damned.

Chuck Wagon said...

Mr. Smith,
You are of course correct. One of those situations where the common usage has stolen the actual meaning - "conservative" now having connotations more closely tied to Glenn Beck than Teddy Roosevelt. Any wonder why I protest the label?

Jim said...

My thought on credibility is they could (1) uncouple the nihilists and totalitarian aims of some in their movement from the science; and, (2) consider the possibility that falsifiability and maybe a bit of modesty about one's claims, as discussed by Popper, maybe ought to enjoy an honored place in science, rather than be treated as partisan political aims that need to be thwarted.

But that's just me. A lot of people, it turns out, are quite happy thinking that "if it's science it means you can't disprove it," and restructuring their lives radically based on that un-disprovable science...

TerribleTerry said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
TerribleTerry said...

the wagon has smarts in his writing
his workouts they aint that xciting
so give him a break
if there's any mistake
from a cold he's needing reviving.

Tis something we must be saying
that words they are simply delaying
call it just strange
or some climate change
while other countries keep on fraying

you need a big ribbon or jingle
something to make their insides do tingle
do it we must
or all will go bust
and with hardship we'll certainly mingle

It doesn't take science to know
use more than you get or can grow
you end up fat
and happy with that
until there just aint no mo fo sho

So call it a partisan scheme
or a money makers wet dream
head in the sand
big tea party band
until someday you surely do scream

What happened to all of my stuff
I can't get no more this is rough
we used it so fast
gone now and past
because words they were just not enough

Alena said...

I recently came across your blog and have been reading along. I thought I would leave my first comment. I don't know what to say except that I have enjoyed reading. Nice blog. I will keep visiting this blog very often.

Alena

http://ovarianpain.net